Math
Computation: Increase Accuracy and Productivity Rates Via Self-Monitoring
and Performance Feedback |
 |
View an Adobe
Acrobat version of this intervention write-up |
Students can improve both their accuracy and fluency on
math computation worksheets by independently self-monitoring their computation
speed, charting their daily progress, and earning rewards for improved
performance.
Materials
Steps to Implementing This Intervention
In preparation for this intervention:
- the teacher selects one or more computation problem
types that the student needs to practice. Using that set of problem
types as a guide, the teacher creates a number of standardized worksheets
with similar items to be used across multiple instructional days. (A
Math Worksheet Generator that will create these worksheets automatically
can be accessed at http://www.interventioncentral.org).
- the teacher prepares a progress-monitoring chart. The
vertical axis of the chart extends from 0 to 100 and is labeled 'Correct
Digits' The horizontal axis of the chart is labeled 'Date'.
- the teacher creates a menu of rewards that the student
can choose from on a given day if the student was able to exceed his
or her previously posted computation fluency score.
At the start of the intervention, the teacher meets
with the student. The teacher shows the student a sample math computation
worksheet and answer key. The teacher tells the student that the student
will have the opportunity to complete similar math worksheets as time
drills and chart the results. The student is told that he or she will
win a reward on any day when the student's number of correctly computed
digits on the worksheet exceeds that of the previous day.
During each day of the intervention:
- The student is given one of the math computation worksheets
previously created by the teacher, along with an answer key. The student
first consults his or her progress-monitoring chart and notes the most
recent charted computation fluency score previously posted. The student
is encouraged to try to exceed that score.
- When the intervention session starts, the student is
given a pre-selected amount of time (e.g., 5 minutes) to complete as
many problems on the computation worksheet as possible. The student
sets a timer for the allocated time and works on the computation sheet
until the timer rings.
- The student then uses the answer key to check his or
her work, giving credit for each correct digit in an answer. (A 'correct
digits' is defined as a digit of the correct value that appears in the
correct place-value location in an answer. In this scoring method, students
can get partial credit even if some of the digits in an answer are correct
and some are incorrect.).
- The student plots his or her computational fluency
score on the progress-monitoring chart and writes the current date at
the bottom of the chart below the plotted data point. The student is
allowed to select a choice from the reward menu if he or she exceeds
the most recent, previously posted fluency score.
References
Bennett, K., & Cavanaugh, R. A. (1998). Effects of
immediate self-correction, delayed self-correction, and no correction
on the acquisition and maintenance of multiplication facts by a fourth-grade
student with learning disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,
31, 303-306.
Shimabukuro, S. M., Prater, M. A., Jenkins, A., &
Edelen-Smith, P. (1999). The effects of self-monitoring of academic performance
on students with learning disabilities and ADD/ADHD. Education and
Treatment of Children, 22, 397-414.
|
 |